The FDA’s Expedited Programs and Clinical Development Times for Novel Therapeutics, 2012-2016

Hwang TJ, Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS - JAMA

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Among 174 new drugs approved from 2012 to 2016, 60% qualified for at least 1 of the FDA’s 4 expedited programs, with breakthrough therapy-designated drugs having the shortest median development time, while drugs receiving only priority review or accelerated approval (without fast-track or breakthrough status) showed no significant difference in development times compared to non-expedited drugs. These findings suggest that the fast-track and breakthrough programs, which are specifically designed to shorten the clinical trial process, are achieving their intended effect, while the other expedited programs primarily accelerate regulatory review rather than overall development.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence