The 21st Century Cures Act—Will It Take Us Back in Time?

Avorn J, Kesselheim AS - New England Journal of Medicine

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

While the 21st Century Cures Act includes welcome NIH funding increases, key provisions could weaken FDA approval standards by encouraging reliance on less rigorous evidence such as observational data, surrogate endpoints, and adaptive trial designs. The authors argue that the current drug approval process is already efficient and that lowering evidence thresholds risks approving drugs that are ineffective or harmful.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence