Testimony: 21st Century Cures: Modernizing Clinical Trials

Kesselheim AS - 113th Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Kesselheim argues that the FDA’s requirement for rigorous premarket testing of drugs and high-risk devices emerged as a rational response to public health tragedies, and that the agency already has substantial flexibility to expedite important new products. He cautions that approving drugs based on unvalidated trial designs or surrogate endpoints puts patients at risk, citing bedaquiline as a cautionary example, and notes that post-approval confirmatory studies and safety surveillance systems remain underdeveloped. Watch his testimony.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence