Patient Perceptions of and Experiences with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies

Sarpatwari A, Lee SB, Zakoul H, Tekle W, Freedman A, Belitkar S, Toyserkani GA, LaCivita C, Zhou EH, Oswell KH, Dal Pan GJ, Kesselheim AS - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

In interviews with patients and caregivers using seven drugs subject to FDA risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs, participants were found to be generally knowledgeable about REMS-related drug risks, but some encountered challenges finding prescribers, navigating testing requirements, and managing the administrative burdens of these programs. REMS programs are effective in educating patients about drug risks, but better integration of REMS into clinical workflows can improve medication access and adherence.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence