Physicians’ Knowledge About FDA Approval Standards and Perceptions of the “Breakthrough Therapy” Designation

Kesselheim AS, Woloshin S, Eddings W, Franklin JM, Ross KM, Schwartz LM - JAMA

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

A survey of 675 board-certified internists and specialists found widespread misunderstanding of FDA approval standards. 73% incorrectly believed approval means a drug is as effective as others for the same condition, and only 6% correctly identified that FDA approval requires neither a statistically significant nor a clinically important result specifically. When presented with 2 identical hypothetical drugs differing only in whether one carried the “breakthrough” label, physicians significantly preferred prescribing the designated “breakthrough” drug, demonstrating that the term influences prescribing behavior independent of actual clinical evidence.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence