Physician Experiences with and Perceptions of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs with Elements to Assure Safe Use

Sarpatwari A, Brown BL, McGraw SA, Dejene SZ, Abdurrob A, Kesselheim AS - PLOS ONE

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Interviewed physicians held mixed views on the impact of FDA risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs for drugs on their clinical practice, with many expressing concerns about the programs’ administrative burden and patient privacy. This suggests that while REMS programs may have positive features, they must be better integrated into clinical workflows.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

The Impact of Semantics in Medicines Regulation

Costa E, Kesselheim AS - Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence