Pharmaceutical Efficacy: The Illusory Legal Standard

Darrow JJ - Washington and Lee Law Review

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

The author argues that despite lengthy and expensive drug development processes, the FDA’s efficacy standard under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act permits approval of drugs with minimal effectiveness, as it requires only “substantial evidence” of an effect without establishing any meaningful threshold for the magnitude of that efficacy. The author concludes that FDA approval should not be interpreted as assurance that approved medicines, particularly new and expensive drugs, possess efficacy meaningfully greater than no effiacy at all, with the responsibility for determining acceptable efficacy levels delegated to market forces.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence