Negative Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials: Why Cancer Drugs Fail The Last Barrier?

Gyawali B, Addeo A - International Journal of Cancer

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Among 16 negative Phase 3 RCTs of new cancer drugs published in major journals in 2016, only 3 were supported by a previous positive Phase 2 trial, while 3 proceeded despite a negative Phase 2, 5 were based on inconclusive Phase 2 data, and 1 had no prior Phase 2 at all. The authors argue that institutional review boards and regulatory authorities should discourage Phase 3 RCTs lacking positive Phase 2 data, and that prospective criteria for defining Phase 2 success should be established to prevent the waste of substantial human and financial resources on trials with a low probability of success.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence