Lifecycle Regulation and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices

Vokinger KN, Hwang TJ, Kesselheim AS - The Future of Medical Device Regulation: Innovation and Protection

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Between 2017-2018, the FDA cleared fourteen AI and ML-based software products as devices, yet the evidence for safety and effectiveness at market entry remains limited, prompting the need for a lifecycle-based regulatory framework. Manufacturers and the FDA should establish pre-approved “safe harbor” modifications for real-time software adaptation, implement guardrails to monitor cumulative changes, and require heightened transparency standards to address the inherent opacity of AI/ML systems and enable informed decision-making by patients and clinicians.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence