Law, Politics, and Expert Panels at the US Food and Drug Administration

Daval CJ, Kesselheim AS - JAMA Health Forum

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

The FDA’s recent shift from formal advisory committees to ad hoc “expert panels” risks undermining the agency’s scientific independence by soliciting advice that appears aligned with predetermined policy positions. The authors argue this approach raises legal concerns under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and reflects a troubling prioritization of political signaling over evidence-based decisionmaking.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence