Implications of Medicare Negotiation and Most-Favored-Nation Pricing for Cancer Medicine Costs

Hwang TJ, Tibau A, Kesselheim AS, Vokinger KN - JAMA Health Forum

  • Price, Value, and Access

Summary:

In this cohort study of brand-name cancer drugs in Medicare Part B and Part D, applying most-favored-nation (MFN) pricing tied to international benchmarks in 2024 could have reduced Medicare drug spending by an incremental 28-41% compared to Medicare negotiation alone. However, the long-term sustainability of MFN savings is uncertain given the potential for manufacturer gaming, and policymakers should explore sharing savings with patients by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for highly effective therapies.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

Pharmaceutical Industry Pay-Per-Click Advertising Strategies to Influence Public Opinions on Drug Pricing

Eisenkraft Klein D, Kesselheim AS - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

  • Price, Value, and Access
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

Coverage and Costs for Medications After Medicare Price Negotiation

Cai CL, Bucha S, Kesselheim AS, Rome BN - Journal of General Internal Medicine

  • Price, Value, and Access
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

Methodological Divergence in Oncology HTA: Implications for International Harmonization and the Handling of Uncertainty

Chen NC, Bullement A, Zemplenyi AT, O'Bryant CL, Kaizer AM, Anderson KE, McQueen RB - PharmacoEconomics Open

  • Price, Value, and Access