Experts’ Views on FDA Regulatory Standards for Drug and High-Risk Medical Devices: Implications for Patient Care

Dhruva SS, Darrow JJ, Kesselheim AS, Redberg RF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Interviewed experts reported that increased use of FDA expedited approval pathways has led to greater reliance on surrogate endpoints with uncertain clinical significance and that many physicians are unaware when drugs or high‑risk devices are approved through these pathways. Participants expressed concern that evidentiary uncertainty is not adequately communicated to patients and emphasized the need to incorporate explanations of expedited review and its limitations into informed treatment consent.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence