Data Sharing That Enables Postapproval Drug and Device Research and Protects Patient Privacy: Best Practice Recommendations

Sarpatwari A, Malin BA, Kesselheim AS, Gagne JJ, Schneeweiss SG - Big Data, Health Law, and Bioethics

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

This book chapter evaluates the three HIPAA-compliant pathways for sharing health data in postapproval drug and device research — limited data sets, safe harbor deidentification, and expert determination — and identifies key limitations of each for pharmacoepidemiologic studies. The authors propose best practice recommendations for the underutilized expert determination pathway, including proportional risk thresholds, routine modeling of reidentification attack scenarios, and use of data-use agreements to balance research utility with patient privacy.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

The Impact of Semantics in Medicines Regulation

Costa E, Kesselheim AS - Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence