Crowdsourcing Clinical Trials

Darrow JJ - Minnesota Law Review

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

The article identifies a fundamental ethical flaw in pharmaceutical regulation: newly FDA-approved drugs are effectively “tested” on an unknowing general public in the months and years after approval, due to the inherent inability of even the largest preapproval clinical trials to detect rare adverse events. The author proposes a “crowdsourcing” framework to improve post-approval drug surveillance, addressing the gap between the limited safety data available at the time of FDA approval and the full risk profile that only emerges through widespread clinical use.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

The Impact of Semantics in Medicines Regulation

Costa E, Kesselheim AS - Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence