Biosimilar Approval Pathways: Comparing the Roles of Five Medicines Regulators

Knox RP, Desai V, Sarpatwari A - Journal of Law and the Biosciences

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

The authors compare the regulatory approval process for biosimilars in five jurisdictions (Australia, Canada, EU, UK, and US), noting differences in biosimilar testing requirements and policies regarding indication extrapolation, exclusivities, and biosimilar substitution. Understanding the impact of these policies on biosimilar approval and uptake is important to strengthen the global biosimilar market.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence