Assessing Drug Efficacy After Multiple Negative Trials—Gepirone’s Journey Through the FDA

Turner EH, Powers JH, Ahn-Horst RY, Kesselheim AS - JAMA Psychiatry

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

This case study traces how the antidepressant gepirone ER won FDA approval in 2023 on just 2 positive trials out of 13, after four prior rejections and a negative advisory committee vote. The authors argue this reflects the FDA’s reliance on “trial counting” and statistical over clinical significance, and that the label compounds the problem by omitting the 11 negative trials. FDA should report all efficacy trials and an overall effect size in labeling so clinicians can better assess a drug’s clinical benefit.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

The Impact of Semantics in Medicines Regulation

Costa E, Kesselheim AS - Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence