A Multi-Modal Approach to Evaluate the Impact of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Programs

Sarpatwari A, Mitra-Majumdar M, Bykov K, Avorn J, Woloshin S, Toyserkani GA, LaCivita C, Manzo C, Zhou EH, Pinnow E, Dal Pan GJ, Gagne JJ, Huybrechts KF, Feldman WB, Chin K, Kesselheim AS - Drug Safety

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

A systematic, multi-method study describes a framework for evaluating how FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs have operated in practice, incorporating insurance claims analyses of drug use and patient outcomes, physician and patient surveys and interviews, and assessments of risk communication effectiveness. The research aims to address the current lack of evidence on REMS program impacts on informed decision-making, medication access, and patient outcomes, with the goal of generating actionable recommendations for program improvement.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence