Communicating Drug Safety and Safe Use Conditions in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Materials

Sarpatwari A, Tessema FA, Mitra-Majumdar M, Lee SB, Zakoul H, Brown BL, Toyserkani GA, Oswell KH, LaCivita C, Dal Pan GJ, Woloshin S, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS - Drug Safety

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Educational materials for 13 drugs with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs contained a median of 14 documents and 69 pages per program. Patient-directed materials had a median tenth-grade reading level, above the sixth-grade level recommended by the AMA, and took a median of 18 minutes per drug to read. REMS-specific risks appeared in a median of 80% of documents and drug indications in 33%, while drug benefits went unmentioned in 8 of 13 packages. Streamlining REMS materials for all audiences may improve comprehension and support safe use.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence