Non-Approval in the Sunlight: FDA’s CRL Disclosures, the Limits of Confidentiality, and Lessons from the EMA

Lenarczyk G, Minssen T, Kesselheim AS - Journal of Law and the Biosciences

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

FDA’s 2025 disclosure of complete response letters (CRLs) represents a shift from historical treatment of CRLs as confidential, though the agency has not committed to a specific posting timeline for future disclosures. Drawing on a comparison with the European Medicines Agency’s more standardized disclosure practices, the authors recommend that FDA codify disclosure timelines and redaction standards, provide neutral summaries of CRLs when redactions obscure the basis for non-approval, and standardize the inclusion of prior-cycle CRLs in drug approval packages.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence