Risk of Bias and Clinical Benefit of Phase III Trials Supporting FDA-Approved Anticancer Medicines, 2018–2025: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Li G, Pu Y, Chen C, Kesselheim AS, Tibau A - European Journal of Cancer

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Among 43 pivotal phase III randomized trials supporting FDA approvals of anticancer drugs, only 30% of trials were at low risk of bias and 33% demonstrated substantial clinical benefit, while just 9% achieved both. FDA regulatory review documents frequently provided methodological information that reduced uncertainty compared with published reports. These findings highlight the importance of integrating trial quality and clinical benefit assessments to strengthen regulatory decision-making, inform clinical practice, and support value-based oncology care.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence