Orphan Designation for Drugs Approved in the United States and European Union: A Comparative Analysis

Costa E, Ross JS, Kesselheim AS - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

The US Orphan Drug Act and EU Orphan Regulation both offer incentives to develop rare disease treatments, but of 344 rare disease drug indications approved from 2011 to 2020, 97.7% received FDA Orphan Drug designation versus only 40.4% from the EMA, with the agencies aligning most on advanced therapies and genetic diseases but diverging on cancer subsets and pediatric indications of common diseases like HIV. These differences reflect the broader US indication-based framework versus the EU’s narrower focus on distinct conditions, suggesting policymakers should target incentives toward truly rare diseases rather than subsets of common conditions like cancer.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence