Priority Without Progress: The FDA’s Neglected Tropical Disease Voucher Program After 18 Years

Goh M, Outterson K, Kesselheim AS - Health Affairs Scholar

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Of the 14 priority review vouchers awarded by the FDA for neglected tropical disease (NTD) products since 2007, most went to existing therapies already widely used outside the US, with FDA approval often occurring years after use in regions in which the NTDs were prevalent. These findings suggest that the NTD voucher program largely rewards regulatory submissions rather than innovation. Policymakers should abandon the voucher or implement reforms that tie voucher eligibility to equitable pricing and demonstrable gains in patient access.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
An icon of a bill representing government policy.

Comments on FDA Discussion Paper, “Considerations for the Regulation of Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices”

Jaiswal N, Gorijavolu R, Thomas S, Hwang TJ, Celi LA, Kesselheim AS - Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence