New FDA Breakthrough-Drug Category—Implications for Patients

Darrow JJ, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS - New England Journal of Medicine

  • Innovation Incentives and Competition
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence

Summary:

Created by Congress in 2012, the FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation was intended to expedite approval of drugs showing “exceptional results for patients,” yet in its first year the FDA received 92 applications, far exceeding expectations of approximately 2 per year, and approved 27 designations, raising concerns about a potential surge in drugs approved on the basis of limited clinical data. The authors trace the history of prior expedited-access programs and examine the clinical, ethical, and regulatory implications of this latest pathway, noting the dangers illustrated by cases like ponatinib, which was briefly suspended after accelerated approval when serious thromboembolic events emerged in up to 48% of patients.

VIEW SOURCE

Recent Work from PORTAL

Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

How Congress Can Fix Expert Advisory Committees

Daval CJR, Kesselheim AS - STAT

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Simple graphic of magnifying glass examining papers to signify reviewing research publications.

International Regulatory Status and Reimbursement Recommendations of Haematological Malignancy Drugs Withdrawn from the FDA Accelerated Approval Pathway

Mulsant SS, Kesselheim AS, Naci H - Journal of Cancer Policy

  • Price, Value, and Access
  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence
Talk bubble graphics representing commentary and opinion.

Politics and the Patient Encounter, in Dire Times

Avorn J - MedPage Today

  • Regulation and Clinical Evidence